Auction 56 Part 1
By The Arc
Oct 10, 2020
Moscow, embankment of Taras Shevchenko, d. 3, Russia
Books, open letters, engravings, etchings, posters, photographs, autographs, signs and medals.
The auction has ended

LOT 9:

A short Russian grammar, published by Nikolai Grech.

catalog
  Previous item
Next item 

Start price:
3,000 р
Buyer's Premium: 20% More details
tags: Books

A short Russian grammar, published by Nikolai Grech.
Tenth edition.

St. Petersburg, 1847, 146 p. Hardcover, size 12 x 20 cm. Good condition, rare marginalia, scuffed binding.

Today, N. I. Grech (1787-1867) is better known as a conservative journalist who "sobered up from liberal ideas Willy-nilly", editor of "Son of the Fatherland" and "Northern bee", memoirist. Russian Russian Russian grammar (St. Petersburg, 1827) became the first "systematic grammatical guide" (V. V. Vinogradov) in Russia, and "brief Russian grammar" (the first name — "Initial rules of Russian grammar") — a stable textbook.

Grammar Manuals by N. I. Grech were very Popular in Russia until the end of the 40s of the XIX century. Taking into account their main provisions, various school textbooks of the Russian language were compiled, which were used in teaching practice until the 60s of the XIX century, when they were already declared "legends of antiquity". Reference to the grammatical works of Grech allows us to establish what information about the language was received by Russian high school students in the first half of the XIX century.

"Since the fifteenth Year of my birth, " recalled N. I. Grech, " the idea of creating a new Russian grammar has been lurking in my soul." "I saw the insufficiency of our grammars in comparison with foreign ones, and their incongruity with the conclusions of universal grammar."

Grech turns to work on Russian grammar at the end of the first decade of the XIX century. In 1817, by the decision of the Minister of national education, philosophical grammar was excluded from the curriculum of high schools, which meant the return of traditional practical grammar. A study Committee set up in 1818 to review published textbooks found the grammars available at that time unsatisfactory. There was a need to create new grammar manuals. This Problem was solved by Ni. Grech, who already had a lot of experience teaching Russian literature in St. Petersburg schools and gymnasiums.

The grammar of Greek is built as a normative guide, the purpose of which is "to teach you to speak and write Russian correctly". Grammar is based on observations of book speech, which was repeatedly emphasized by the Greek himself: "If Russian grammar begins to set out the rules of a non-General, bookish language, it will have to change in each province according to the requirements of the local dialect." The grammar of Greek consists of four parts: "Word production", which corresponds to modern morphology, "Word Combinations", "pronunciation of words" and "Spelling". Russian Russian course structure is traditional for the first half of the XIX century, but Grech's innovation is shown in the fact that, motivating the sequence of sections, he connects it with the development of practical skills: the first part gives a General description of parts of speech and the formation of basic grammatical forms, the second sets out the rules for connecting "parts and particles together to produce understandable speech", the third "suggests rules for speaking and reading Russian", and finally, the fourth "calculates the rules for writing correctly in Russian". Greek, therefore, sees the purpose of its grammar in the gradual mastery of different types of speech activity: reading, speaking and writing.

Describing parts of speech, Greek consistently distinguishes between significant and service words (speech particles). As part of the first, the noun, adjective, pronoun, verb, participle, adverb and adverb are distinguished; as part of speech particles, the preposition, conjunction and interjection are distinguished.

The characteristic of participles in the Greek manual is contradictory: on the one hand, they are considered as an independent part of speech, on the other hand, they are included in adjectives as their special category — "acting, which expresses not the quality found in the subject, but its action; for example: a green tree; flowing water; a student reading. Numerals in Greek grammar are not part of parts of speech (as an independent part of speech, numerals were first identified only in 1841 by G. P. Pavsky), but are distributed between nouns and adjectives. Nouns, for example, include: forty, one hundred, one thousand, twenty, fifty, etc., adjectives — one, two, both, one and a half, first, second, etc.

The structure of describing parts of speech in Greek grammar is similar to modern textbooks: first, a definition is given indicating the meaning or function of a particular part of speech, then lexical and grammatical categories are marked. So, in the composition of nouns, proper, common, collective, real, diminutive and magnifying are distinguished, in the composition of adjectives, qualitative, circumstantial, possessive and active (= participles) are distinguished.

The classification of pronouns developed by Grech is extremely close to the modern one. Over the course of two centuries, school textbooks distinguish exactly the categories of pronouns that were proposed by Grech, over time only negative pronouns were added to them.

Information about word formation in Greek grammar is extremely limited. At the same time, its undoubted merit is a clear and strict division of words, first, into "primitive" ("not derived from other words") and derivatives-"derived from a word that already exists in the language"; second, into simple in structure and complex. Since in the 20s of the XIX century there was no concept of "morpheme" and there was no classification of affixes, Greek uses the terms "main roots" and "subordinate roots", which are then divided into "previous" or prefixes, and "subsequent".

Noteworthy is the attempt of Greek to distinguish between word formation and form formation. This is related to his consideration of "constant "and" random " changes in significant words. "Permanent" changes occur "when composing words derived and complex (hand, hand, two — handed, etc.), "random" - denote various circumstances of the concept expressed by the word" (hand, hands, eye, eyes, etc.). Thus, Greek is close to the selection of grammatical forms of words, which allows you to consistently build a section of morphology, which sets out in detail the rules of inflection and gives examples of declension and conjugation.

Especially interesting in Greek grammar is the section devoted to syntax, or "word combination". This is where the novelty of this practical guide is particularly evident. "In the grammar of N. Grech, the idea of the main and secondary members of the sentence was established... — wrote academician V. V. Vinogradov. — Thus, the contours of the logical and semantic understanding of the sentence structure, which with some complications and modifications prevails to this day, have clearly emerged."

The grammar of Greek is dominated by a logical approach to syntax. A sentence is defined by him as "a judgment expressed in words". accordingly, three mandatory parts are distinguished in its structure: the subject, the predicate, and the copula. The bundle is seen in every sentence, in some cases, as the Greek notes, it can "get lost, connecting with the predicate in the verb aggregate": the Leaf turns green. The sun was shining.

Grech's teaching about the conjunction hindered syntactic research, and students were doomed to a largely formal analysis of the sentence. At the same time, the foundations of the theory of sentence members were laid in Greek grammar. It marked for the first time such minor members as definition and complement.

The selection of secondary members of the sentence allowed Grech to clarify the classification of simple sentences and distinguish between "composite "and" non-composite " constructions (common and non-common sentences in modern terminology).

A complex sentence is considered by scientists against the background of a simple one and is interpreted as "the combination of two or more simple sentences". In this case, sentences that are complicated by participial and adverbial turns are also difficult in Greek grammar.

The classification of complex sentences is based on an analogy with the members of a simple sentence, more precisely, with the parts of speech that Express them. So, Greek distinguishes subordinate nouns, adjectives and circumstantial. Introductory sentences are consistently distinguished from subordinate clauses. It was Grech who proposed their clear and strict definitions. Cf.: "the Main sentence does not depend on the other… The subordinate clause is supplemented, explained, and delimited.… An introductory sentence is one that is included in the main sentence, but does not have a grammatical connection with it, i.e. it is not connected to it by means of pronouns and conjunctions; for example: In Moscow, my brother writes, it is now freezing." This definition of introductory sentences can be easily presented in modern textbooks of the Russian language.

So, in the grammar of Greek, a thorough description of the forms of inflection was given, the foundations of the doctrine of sentence members were laid, a number of new concepts were proposed, and the first detailed classification of complex sentences was developed. Although by the end of the 1950s this grammar was perceived as "old in spirit and body", it played an important role in the formation of the school course of the Russian language and the formation of the norms of the literary language.

catalog
  Previous item
Next item